“It always struck us as annoying, but harmless enough: retailers asking for your ZIP Code at the tail end of a transaction.
But the California Supreme Court now tells us such a maneuver violates consumersā privacy. In a ruling issued Thursday pitting a woman who made a purchase at Williams-Sonoma in 2008 and the retailer, the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Golden State retailers may no longer collect ZIP Codes from credit-card customers.
Click here for the WSJ story; here for the LA Times article; here for the San Francisco Chronicle article; here for the 17-page opinion.
The Supreme Court determined that ZIP Codes were āpersonal identification informationā that merchants canāt demand from customers under a state consumer privacy law. Merchants typically use ZIP Codes to determine where their customers live and for other marketing purposes.
The plaintiff in the case, Jessica Pineda, of Menlo Park, claimed that the store used her name and ZIP Code to identify her address and then stored the information in a database for later marketing. She also contended that he store had the ability to sell her information to other businesses.
Williams-Sonoma argued that ZIP Codes did not provide personal information because they pertained to a group, not an individual.
The high court rejected the retailerās assertions. . .” WSJ has the full story.
FASHIONENTLAW blog, authored by Ms. Uduak, was first established in 2010. It is now incorporated, in 2021, as part of the FASHIONENTLAW LAW FIRM blog. The blog is for informational purposes only and provides legal commentary and analysis on the intersection of mainstream America pop culture and the law. It also provides updates on Ms. Uduak’s speaking engagements and press activities. For inquiries on topics covered on this site, please get in touch with our firm. If you seek legal representation for your specific legal needs, please schedule a consultation.
šCall 916-857-9970 or
šEmail ([email protected])
š» Schedule a consultation directly on this site.