“It always struck us as annoying, but harmless enough: retailers asking for your ZIP Code at the tail end of a transaction.
But the California Supreme Court now tells us such a maneuver violates consumers’ privacy. In a ruling issued Thursday pitting a woman who made a purchase at Williams-Sonoma in 2008 and the retailer, the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Golden State retailers may no longer collect ZIP Codes from credit-card customers.
Click here for the WSJ story; here for the LA Times article; here for the San Francisco Chronicle article; here for the 17-page opinion.
The Supreme Court determined that ZIP Codes were “personal identification information” that merchants can’t demand from customers under a state consumer privacy law. Merchants typically use ZIP Codes to determine where their customers live and for other marketing purposes.
The plaintiff in the case, Jessica Pineda, of Menlo Park, claimed that the store used her name and ZIP Code to identify her address and then stored the information in a database for later marketing. She also contended that he store had the ability to sell her information to other businesses.
Williams-Sonoma argued that ZIP Codes did not provide personal information because they pertained to a group, not an individual.
The high court rejected the retailer’s assertions. . .” WSJ has the full story.

The FASHIONENTLAW Blog features legal insights, commentary, and analysis on contracts, intellectual property, business disputes, media, fashion, entertainment, and emerging issues shaping the creative industries.
Authored by Uduak Oduok professionally known as Ms. Uduak, a California fashion and entertainment lawyer with over 24 years of legal experience, the blog is designed for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
To discuss your specific legal matter, schedule a consultation with the firm.
Schedule a Consultation
