““On Thursday, a New York appeals court ruled that a company could not see the plaintiffâs protected data, but not simply because it was private. Letâs see what happenedâŠ
Russell Patterson brought a personal injury lawsuit against Turner Construction Company (itâs unclear what kind of injury, specifically). On October 27, the New York Appellate Division (First Department) reversed the state supreme court in Patterson v. Turner Construction Co.. The court said the company could not have access to all of Pattersonâs Facebook files, because the request wasnât specific enough:
[W]e reverse and remand for a more specific identification of plaintiffâs Facebook information that is relevant, in that it contradicts or conflicts with plaintiffâs alleged restrictions, disabilities, and losses, and other claims.InsideCounsel wrote that the case highlights increasing limitations on the use of social media in litigation. But to me it seems the courts are simply having to work out more specific ways to deal with the increasing presence of social media in employment-related disputes. Facebook certainly wonât be used less in litigation anytime soon.
During most discovery proceedings, fishing expeditions waste everyoneâs time. Litigants need relevant information, whether itâs in email or on Facebook. Attorneys canât just say, âGive us all your Facebook files!â Thereâs got to be a reason to go digging.
Even though the InsideCounsel and Reuters articles focused on the fact that the court didnât allow access to some of Pattersonâs information, I find it more surprising that the password-protected nature of the information is even being considered. Itâs a pretty direct about-face from just a few years ago:
The postings on plaintiffâs online Facebook account, if relevant, are not shielded from discovery merely because plaintiff used the serviceâs privacy settings to restrict access⊠just as relevant matter from a personal diary is discoverable. . .”
Above the Law has the full story.
FASHIONENTLAW blog, authored by Ms. Uduak, was first established in 2010. It is now incorporated, in 2021, as part of the FASHIONENTLAW LAW FIRM blog. The blog is for informational purposes only and provides legal commentary and analysis on the intersection of mainstream America pop culture and the law. It also provides updates on Ms. Uduak’s speaking engagements and press activities. For inquiries on topics covered on this site, please get in touch with our firm. If you seek legal representation for your specific legal needs, please schedule a consultation.
đCall 916-857-9970 or
đEmail ([email protected])
đ» Schedule a consultation directly on this site.